<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Grass is grue&#8221;</title>
	<link>http://www.rasmusen.org/x/2007/02/06/grass-is-grue/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: SteveG</title>
		<link>http://www.rasmusen.org/x/2007/02/06/grass-is-grue/#comment-217492</link>
		<author>SteveG</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 15:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.rasmusen.org/x/2007/02/06/grass-is-grue/#comment-217492</guid>
		<description>Actually, Goodman's "New Riddle of Induction" would have no relevance whatsoever to questions about evolution and intelligent design because both are attempting to give explanations of natural phenomena.  The Disovery Institute's arguments based on complexity theory would suffer the same exact issues as any other explanation that refers to general propositions based on induction.

If you want a conversation about ID, &lt;a href="http://philosophersplayground.blogspot.com/2006/12/demarcation-falsification-and.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; is another post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Goodman&#8217;s &#8220;New Riddle of Induction&#8221; would have no relevance whatsoever to questions about evolution and intelligent design because both are attempting to give explanations of natural phenomena.  The Disovery Institute&#8217;s arguments based on complexity theory would suffer the same exact issues as any other explanation that refers to general propositions based on induction.</p>
<p>If you want a conversation about ID, <a href="http://philosophersplayground.blogspot.com/2006/12/demarcation-falsification-and.html" rel="nofollow">here</a> is another post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
