Spontaneouse Generation and Evolution

p>Three Hierarchies makes the nice point that if you look closely, the Bible does not say that God directly created animals and plants, just that He created the earth, and that spontaneous generation– as opposed to God having created all living things directly— was long accepted by Christians and everyone else. It was only in the 1800’s that scientists showed that life comes from life, so that the origins of life became a puzzle:

The origin of life for the first time became a topic on which Christian theologians were generally expected to have a different viewpoint from natural philosophers. But this is a development which I think has no foundation in the text of Genesis 1 [+/-]Open Link in New Window at all, and was purely governed by the scientific developments I listed above.

Let’s look at Genesis 1 [+/-]Open Link in New Window on the origin of plants:

And God said, “Let the earth sprout vegetation, plants yielding seed, and fruit trees bearing fruit in which is their seed, each according to its kind, on the earth.” And it was so. The earth brought forth vegetation, plants yielding seed according to their own kinds, and trees bearing fruit in which is their seed, each according to its kind. And God saw that it was good. And there was evening and there was morning, the third day.

For comparison, let’s look at the following passage on the origin of the sun, moon, and stars:

And God said, “Let there be lights in the expanse of the heavens to separate the day from the night. And let them be for signs and for seasons, and for days and years, and let them be lights in the expanse of the heavens to give light upon the earth.” And it was so. And God made the two great lights—the greater light to rule the day and the lesser light to rule the night—and the stars.

Contrast the two bolded phrases. Reading it without Louis Pasteur and Michael Behe in mind, they can naturally be read as saying that God’s creation of plants was mediated by natural processes: He spoke (primary cause) and the earth brought forth (secondary cause). But with the sun and moon, He spoke (primary cause), and He made (no secondary cause). This is in fact the argument made by Gerald Schroeder in his books, Genesis and the Big Bang and The Science of God: although science cannot show any case, or even any genuinely plausible scenario, of life originating from inorganic matter, it must be so because the plain word of Scripture teaches it.

But why is it that the average Christian today is convinced that the origin of life is a miracle that demands God’s direction intervention, but that the sun could have been naturally formed by a contracting cloud of gases? Not because of anything in Genesis, but because science has so far not been able to successfully explain the origin of life, but it has successfully (more or less) explained the origin of nuclear fusion.

As for me, I’ll stick with Schroeder’s reading.

Very nice point. Ironically, it is the viewpoint of modern science that makes some Christians afraid of modern science. If you think all life has a common origin, then Darwin is a threat, by providing that common origin. If you think life arises in various ways and times, just as rocks are created at various ways and times, sometimes even by human agency, then evolution only would be explaining part of life.

Under the older view, the appearance of new species, naturally or created by man, would be no big deal. There was no need to have everything created at The Beginning. Six-Day Creationism made no sense, because new things were arising all the time out of the old things.

It’s interesting that the coming into existence of new seas is not viewed as contradicting Genesis by Creationists, but the coming into existence of new species is.

Leave a Reply


Bad Behavior has blocked 1203 access attempts in the last 7 days.