 \documentclass{article}
 
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{amsmath}
 
\input{tcilatex}

\parskip 10pt
\reversemarginpar
   \topmargin  -.4in
  \oddsidemargin .25in
  \textheight 9.5in
 \textwidth 6.9in  
   
         \begin{document}   
 \baselineskip 24pt
%\begin{footnotesize}
     \parindent 24pt   
            \titlepage   
     	      \vspace*{-84pt}
\noindent
{\bf  Examples of Plea Bargains }\footnote{Excerpted from  {\bf {\it   Mezzanatto} and  the Economics of Self Incrimination} ({\it Cardozo Law Review}), Eric Rasmusen,  Indiana University School of Business, Rm. 456,   
  1309 E 10th Street,   Bloomington, Indiana, 47405-1701.
Secretary: 812-855-9219. Direct: 812-855-3356.   Fax: 812-855-3354.   
Erasmuse@indiana.edu.  Http://www.rasmusen.org.}





 An example of this third type of waiver is the following
excerpt from   an agreement under which the  true-life 
organized crime figure  portrayed in the movie {\it Goodfellas}  agreed to testify against his associates: 
   \begin{quotation}
 \vspace*{-12pt} 
   In addition, in the event that you do not fully comply with all
the other terms of this understanding (immediate full and truthful
disclosure, testimony, etc. ), this agreement will be nullified.
Should this occur, the Government will be free to prosecute you with
regard to any and all violations of the federal criminal law in which
you may have participated, and to use against you any and all
statements made by you and testimony you have given prior and
subsequent to the date of this agreement.\footnote{
 Nicholas Pileggi, WISE GUY     283  (1985).}   
   \vspace*{-12pt}
 
 \end{quotation}



 The  standard agreement in use in the Eastern District of New York is quite similar to the one   in {\it Stirling}: 
            \begin{quotation}
 \vspace*{-6pt} 
    If the Office determines that [the cooperator] has
cooperated fully, provided substantial assistance to law enforcement
authorities and otherwise complied with the terms of this agreement,
the Office will file a motion with the sentencing court setting forth
the nature and extent of [his] cooperation. . . .  In this connection
it is understood that the Office's determination of whether [the
cooperator] has cooperated fully and provided substantial assistance,
and the Office's assessment of the value, truthfulness, completeness
and accuracy of the cooperation, shall be binding upon [him].... Should it be judged by the Office that [the cooperator] has
failed to cooperate fully, or has intentionally given false,
misleading or incomplete information or testimony . . . [he] shall
thereafter be subject to prosecution for any federal criminal
violation of which the Office has knowledge, including, but not
limited to, perjury and obstruction of justice.\footnote{  Graham  Hughes, Agreements for Cooperation in Criminal Cases, 45 Vand. L. Rev. 1, 41 (1992). ,  at    38.}
   \vspace*{-12pt} 
 \end{quotation}

Reason for the one-sidedness: The Prosecutor has a good reputation, but the defendant does not. 

%\end{footnotesize}
 \end{document}