Difference between revisions of "Candidates for Best Dozen Articles I've Read in 2022"

From Rasmapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
*[https://newcriterion.com/issues/2021/12/unprecedented "Unprecedented: On the Novelty of Our Cultural Predicament,"] Michael Anton, The New Criterion, December 2021.
 
*[https://newcriterion.com/issues/2021/12/unprecedented "Unprecedented: On the Novelty of Our Cultural Predicament,"] Michael Anton, The New Criterion, December 2021.
 +
 +
*[https://stuartritchie.substack.com/p/meta-homeopathy?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email "When meta-analysis goes wrong
 +
A recent study on homeopathy shows reminds us that meta-analysis - like any study - can look superficially solid yet still produce nonsense",] Stuart Ritchie substack (2022).
  
  

Revision as of 19:05, 18 September 2022

A recent study on homeopathy shows reminds us that meta-analysis - like any study - can look superficially solid yet still produce nonsense",] Stuart Ritchie substack (2022).


BY CHRISTOPHER NADON, Unherd (Sept. 5, 2022).