Difference between revisions of "Candidates for Best Dozen Articles I've Read in 2022"

From Rasmapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
*[https://newcriterion.com/issues/2021/12/unprecedented "Unprecedented: On the Novelty of Our Cultural Predicament,"] Michael Anton, The New Criterion, December 2021.
 
*[https://newcriterion.com/issues/2021/12/unprecedented "Unprecedented: On the Novelty of Our Cultural Predicament,"] Michael Anton, The New Criterion, December 2021.
  
*[https://stuartritchie.substack.com/p/meta-homeopathy?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email "When meta-analysis goes wrong
+
*[https://stuartritchie.substack.com/p/meta-homeopathy?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email "When meta-analysis goes wrong: A recent study on homeopathy shows reminds us that meta-analysis - like any study - can look superficially solid yet still produce nonsense",] Stuart Ritchie substack (2022).
A recent study on homeopathy shows reminds us that meta-analysis - like any study - can look superficially solid yet still produce nonsense",] Stuart Ritchie substack (2022).  
+
 
 +
*[https://substack.com/inbox/post/74053399 :The Two Wings of Postmodernism...,"] WOKAL DISTANCE, Substack (9/21/2022).
  
  

Revision as of 11:39, 21 September 2022


BY CHRISTOPHER NADON, Unherd (Sept. 5, 2022).