Con Law

From Rasmapedia
Revision as of 19:45, 23 May 2022 by Rasmusen p1vaim (talk | contribs) (Created page with "*Any theory of con law (originalism, Dworkin, etc.) should be compelled to show how it applies to interpreting (a) a commercial contract, and (b) a tax statute. That would s...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • Any theory of con law (originalism, Dworkin, etc.) should be compelled to show how it applies to interpreting (a) a commercial contract, and (b) a tax statute. That would show off the theory's points without the complication of political rationalization.