Difference between revisions of "Con Law"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "*Any theory of con law (originalism, Dworkin, etc.) should be compelled to show how it applies to interpreting (a) a commercial contract, and (b) a tax statute. That would s...") |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 19:45, 23 May 2022
- Any theory of con law (originalism, Dworkin, etc.) should be compelled to show how it applies to interpreting (a) a commercial contract, and (b) a tax statute. That would show off the theory's points without the complication of political rationalization.
