Difference between revisions of "Fallacies"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with " ==Ad Hominem== Re Ramseyer controversy--see Crimson article. Hosaka Yuji's "Mitsubishi Professor" response doesn't count as support for an allegation. Now that I think abo...") |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 14:30, 11 February 2021
Ad Hominem
Re Ramseyer controversy--see Crimson article.
Hosaka Yuji's "Mitsubishi Professor" response doesn't count as support for an allegation. Now that I think about it, it's interesting as Ad Hominem compounded by Guilt by Association compounded by Stereotyping. It's ad hominem because even if Ramseyer is a Bad Man, that doesn't respond to his arguments. It's Guilt by Association because even if Mitsubishi Co. is a Bad Company that doesn't mean Ramseyer is. It's Stereotyping because it assumes that Mitsubishi is Bad because it's a Japanese company.
