Difference between revisions of "Psychology"

From Rasmapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "*[https://digest.bps.org.uk/2017/06/05/these-nine-cognitive-psychology-findings-all-passed-a-stringent-test-of-their-replicability/ 9 Cognitive Psych Findings that Replicate]")
 
(Personality)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
==Personality==
 +
*[https://dynomight.net/in-defense-of-myers-briggs.html "In Defense of Myers-Briggs,"]
 +
 +
*Furnham A, Mouttafi J, Crump J. The Relationship between the Revised NEO-Personality Inventory and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. ''Social Behavior and Personality.'' 2003, 31(6), 577-584.
 +
 +
===Authoritarianism===
 +
*[https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8837383/pdf/nihms-1724297.pdf  The Curious Case of Left-Wing Authoritarianism: When Authoritarian Persons Meet Anti-Authoritarian Norms,"]
 +
Lucian Gideon Conway III,
 +
James D. McFarland,
 +
Thomas H. Costello,
 +
Scott O. Lilienfeld.
 +
<pre>
 +
Left-Wing Authoritarianism (LWA) has a controversial history in psychology. Some researchers
 +
have expressed skepticism about the existence of LWA, whereas others have argued that LWA is
 +
a valid construct. In the present article, we offer a framework to reconcile these two perspectives
 +
by proposing that ideologically-based authoritarian
 +
norms are sometimes in conflict with the
 +
processes that create authoritarian
 +
individuals. In Western political contexts, authoritarian norms
 +
are more likely to occur on the conservative side of the political spectrum; but authoritarian
 +
attributes can occur in both conservatives
 +
and liberals. In our model, left-wing authoritarians thus
 +
often occupy the space where forces influencing authoritarianism are in
 +
conflict. We review
 +
existing evidence related to the model, present novel evidence related to the model, derive
 +
four hypotheses from the model, and discuss criteria for falsifying the model. We conclude by
 +
considering the model’s place in current research on the complexities of ideology.
 +
</pre>
 +
 +
==Replication==
 
*[https://digest.bps.org.uk/2017/06/05/these-nine-cognitive-psychology-findings-all-passed-a-stringent-test-of-their-replicability/ 9 Cognitive Psych Findings that Replicate]
 
*[https://digest.bps.org.uk/2017/06/05/these-nine-cognitive-psychology-findings-all-passed-a-stringent-test-of-their-replicability/ 9 Cognitive Psych Findings that Replicate]
 +
 +
*[https://www.gleech.org/psych List of reversals in psychology findings]
 +
 +
 +
==Fraud in Psychology Research==
 +
*[https://www.experimental-history.com/p/im-so-sorry-for-psychologys-loss A 2023 article on fraud and how odd it is] that when Ariely and Gino went down, we didn't really lose anything.
 +
 +
==Lying==
 +
*[https://t.co/sYR2qcLEhQ FBI article on how hard it is to detect lying] and how it's easier to detect tricks the subject uses to look like he's not lying.

Latest revision as of 09:31, 19 July 2025

Personality

  • Furnham A, Mouttafi J, Crump J. The Relationship between the Revised NEO-Personality Inventory and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Social Behavior and Personality. 2003, 31(6), 577-584.

Authoritarianism

Lucian Gideon Conway III, James D. McFarland, Thomas H. Costello, Scott O. Lilienfeld.

Left-Wing Authoritarianism (LWA) has a controversial history in psychology. Some researchers
have expressed skepticism about the existence of LWA, whereas others have argued that LWA is
a valid construct. In the present article, we offer a framework to reconcile these two perspectives
by proposing that ideologically-based authoritarian
norms are sometimes in conflict with the
processes that create authoritarian
individuals. In Western political contexts, authoritarian norms
are more likely to occur on the conservative side of the political spectrum; but authoritarian
attributes can occur in both conservatives
and liberals. In our model, left-wing authoritarians thus
often occupy the space where forces influencing authoritarianism are in
conflict. We review
existing evidence related to the model, present novel evidence related to the model, derive
four hypotheses from the model, and discuss criteria for falsifying the model. We conclude by
considering the model’s place in current research on the complexities of ideology.

Replication


Fraud in Psychology Research

Lying