Difference between revisions of "Hyperlink in Briefs"

From Rasmapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(My Question to AppellateTwitter)
Line 16: Line 16:
 
  Eric Rasmusen@erasmuse
 
  Eric Rasmusen@erasmuse
 
</pre>
 
</pre>
 +
 +
I did this for my Flynn amicus brief in 2020 with the DC Circuit.  There is certainly no rule against it, and I thought it would help readers.
 +
----

Revision as of 05:45, 11 May 2021

My Question to AppellateTwitter

#appellatetwitter: Has any court started requiring hyperlinks to case cites in briefs? Has any lawyer started putting them in voluntarily, just for the reader's convenience? Is this a bad idea?
10:06 PM · Jan 28, 2021 Eric Rasmusen@erasmuse
·
It's interesting that two state courts are ahead of any federal court on this.
Sean Marotta@smmarotta
·
The New York Appellate Division requires it.  (Or requires the cases to be compiled as an addendum to the brief, but hyperlinks are easier.)
Doug Gladden@gladden_dallas
·
I used to do it. When our office had Lexis, it was very easy to even include hyperlinks to pin cites. It's harder to do that with Westlaw, but it is possible. I stopped though, because I was told that the Texas Courts system automatically inserts hyperlinks.
·
The links wouldn't have to be Westlaw or Lexis. Better would be links to free public websites like Google Scholar or the Cornell site
 Eric Rasmusen@erasmuse

I did this for my Flynn amicus brief in 2020 with the DC Circuit. There is certainly no rule against it, and I thought it would help readers.