Difference between revisions of "Preliminary Injunctions"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "*''eBay Inc. v. MercExchange L.L.C.'' 547 U.S. 388 (2006). Unanimous Thomas opinion that confused preliminary with permanent injunctions. e [https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
*''eBay Inc. v. MercExchange L.L.C.'' 547 U.S. 388 (2006). Unanimous Thomas opinion that confused preliminary with permanent injunctions. e [https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/emlj61&id=787&collection=journals&index= "How Supreme Court Justices Move the Law,"] Hasen, Richard. | *''eBay Inc. v. MercExchange L.L.C.'' 547 U.S. 388 (2006). Unanimous Thomas opinion that confused preliminary with permanent injunctions. e [https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/emlj61&id=787&collection=journals&index= "How Supreme Court Justices Move the Law,"] Hasen, Richard. | ||
| + | |||
| + | *"Section 13(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act provides “[u]pon a proper showing | ||
| + | that, weighing the equities and considering the Commission’s likelihood of ultimate success, such | ||
| + | action would be in the public interest . . . a preliminary injunction may be granted . . . .” 15 U.S.C. | ||
| + | § 53(b)." | ||
| + | : This is better than the four-part test. | ||
Revision as of 17:10, 16 July 2023
- eBay Inc. v. MercExchange L.L.C. 547 U.S. 388 (2006). Unanimous Thomas opinion that confused preliminary with permanent injunctions. e "How Supreme Court Justices Move the Law," Hasen, Richard.
- "Section 13(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act provides “[u]pon a proper showing
that, weighing the equities and considering the Commission’s likelihood of ultimate success, such action would be in the public interest . . . a preliminary injunction may be granted . . . .” 15 U.S.C. § 53(b)."
- This is better than the four-part test.
