Difference between revisions of "SpeechFirst University Database cases"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→The 4th Circuit Virginia Tech Case) |
(→The Appellate Court) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*[https://speechfirst.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/CA4-Speech-First-v.-Sands.pdf The 4th Circuit Court Opinion], with dissent by Judge Wilkinson. | *[https://speechfirst.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/CA4-Speech-First-v.-Sands.pdf The 4th Circuit Court Opinion], with dissent by Judge Wilkinson. | ||
| − | *[https://speechfirst.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/13_Opening-Br | + | *[https://speechfirst.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/13_Opening-Br.pdf The SpeechFirst Main Brief] and [https://speechfirst.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/33_Reply-Brief.pdf Reply Brief] |
| − | *[https://rasmusen.org/special/Virginia_tech_response-brief Virginia Tech's response brief] | + | *[https://rasmusen.org/special/Virginia_tech_response-brief.pdf Virginia Tech's response brief] |
*[https://rasmusen.org/special/21-2061Docket.mhtml The appellate docket] | *[https://rasmusen.org/special/21-2061Docket.mhtml The appellate docket] | ||
Revision as of 20:29, 24 July 2023
Contents
Introduction
The 4th Circuit Virginia Tech Case
The District Court
- The District Court opinion by Judge Urbanski
- The Complaint by SpeechFirst.
The Appellate Court
- The 4th Circuit Court Opinion, with dissent by Judge Wilkinson.
Amici, Pro-SpeechFirst
- Cato and ACTA, counsel Ilya Solmin.
There were no amici for Virginia Tech.
Other Circuits
- Speech First v. Fenves, 979 F.3d 319 (5th Cir. 2020), as revised. University of Texas. Texas loses.
- Speech First v. Schlissel, 939 F.3d 756 (6th Cir. 2019). University of Michigan. Michigan loses.
- Speech First v. Killeen, 968 F.3d 628, (7th Circuit). University of Illinois. Illinois wins.
- Speech First v. Cartwright, 32 F.4th 1110 (11th Cir. 2022). University of Central Florida. Central Florida loses.
